BUSINESS-11 · Undergraduate · ENGLISH · PLANNED
Study an original business case, compare options, make a decision and defend implementation.
Study time is an initial activity estimate, excluding extra reading, revision and extended laboratory or project work. Videos and question bodies have not been produced by adding this outline.
Complete these courses or demonstrate equivalent knowledge. These are recommended prerequisites, not enforced enrolment locks.
YouTube playlist: ARK Business Administration · BBA/MBA | Business Law, Ethics, Governance and Sustainability
Playlist title reserved in the plan; no YouTube playlist or upload has been created yet.
Sign in to save this learning pathPractical outcome: Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review.
Explain legal systems using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain contract formation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain contract performance using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain agency using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain business entities using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain intellectual property using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain consumer protection using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain employment obligations using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Identify legal questions in fictional business cases for local professional review. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Legal systems, Contract formation, Contract performance and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest.
Explain ethical frameworks using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain stakeholder duties using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain board responsibilities using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain executive accountability using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain internal controls using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain whistleblowing using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain anti-corruption using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain governance failures using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Prepare a governance response to a fictional conflict of interest. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Ethical frameworks, Stakeholder duties, Board responsibilities and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions.
Explain corporate responsibility using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain sustainability strategy using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain materiality assessment using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain circular business models using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain human-rights due diligence using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain impact reporting using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain assurance concepts using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain claims verification using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Corporate responsibility, Sustainability strategy, Materiality assessment and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Combine all three sections: Compare social and environmental consequences of two hypothetical decisions. Submit an original worked artifact, evidence or tests, assumptions and a reflection. Rubric: correctness, method, practical usefulness, reproducibility and communication. Self-reviewed, not certified.
6–12 balanced questions sampling every section of Business Law, Ethics, Governance and Sustainability, including interpretation, calculation or reasoning, a misconception and a new application. Passing is 70%; review errors before retrying.
Case discussions, business plans, management simulations and original consulting projects. Guided work leads to an independent attempt, with a diagram, explanation, trace, calculation or tested artifact. Question bodies are generated when opened in your private learning path. Programming submissions are stored as text; the platform does not execute submitted code.
Use original or appropriately licensed datasets. Practical science activities use models or supplied data unless a qualified supervisor has reviewed a physical experiment.
Open the interactive practice sampler →