ECONOMICS-09 · Advanced · ENGLISH · PLANNED
State the question and assumptions, draw the model, analyse evidence and test competing explanations.
Study time is an initial activity estimate, excluding extra reading, revision and extended laboratory or project work. Videos and question bodies have not been produced by adding this outline.
Complete these courses or demonstrate equivalent knowledge. These are recommended prerequisites, not enforced enrolment locks.
YouTube playlist: ARK Economics | Public, Environmental and Health Economics
Playlist title reserved in the plan; no YouTube playlist or upload has been created yet.
Sign in to save this learning pathPractical outcome: Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions.
Explain tax efficiency using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain tax equity using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain optimal taxation concepts using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain public expenditure using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain redistribution using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain social insurance using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain fiscal federalism using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain public debt sustainability using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Compare fictional tax and transfer designs using transparent assumptions. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Tax efficiency, Tax equity, Optimal taxation concepts and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data.
Explain external costs using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain pollution taxes using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain tradable permits using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain valuing environmental changes using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain discounting future impacts using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain common-pool governance using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain climate-policy trade-offs using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain distributional impacts using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Evaluate illustrative pollution policies using supplied emissions data. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering External costs, Pollution taxes, Tradable permits and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence.
Explain health demand using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain insurance markets using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain provider incentives using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain cost-effectiveness using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain education investment using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain returns to education using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain service access using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain evaluation ethics using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Health demand, Insurance markets, Provider incentives and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Combine all three sections: Assess a hypothetical public-service intervention using outcome and cost evidence. Submit an original worked artifact, evidence or tests, assumptions and a reflection. Rubric: correctness, method, practical usefulness, reproducibility and communication. Self-reviewed, not certified.
6–12 balanced questions sampling every section of Public, Environmental and Health Economics, including interpretation, calculation or reasoning, a misconception and a new application. Passing is 70%; review errors before retrying.
Economic diagrams, synthetic datasets, calculations and evidence-based policy memos. Guided work leads to an independent attempt, with a diagram, explanation, trace, calculation or tested artifact. Question bodies are generated when opened in your private learning path. Programming submissions are stored as text; the platform does not execute submitted code.
Use original or appropriately licensed datasets. Practical science activities use models or supplied data unless a qualified supervisor has reviewed a physical experiment.
Open the interactive practice sampler →