FINANCE-11 · Advanced · ENGLISH · PLANNED
Trace cash flows, calculate a transparent model, stress-test assumptions and explain risk.
Study time is an initial activity estimate, excluding extra reading, revision and extended laboratory or project work. Videos and question bodies have not been produced by adding this outline.
Complete these courses or demonstrate equivalent knowledge. These are recommended prerequisites, not enforced enrolment locks.
YouTube playlist: ARK Finance | Fintech, Sustainable Finance and Financial Governance
Playlist title reserved in the plan; no YouTube playlist or upload has been created yet.
Sign in to save this learning pathPractical outcome: Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements.
Explain digital payments using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain payment reconciliation using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain open-banking concepts using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain digital identity using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain automated underwriting using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain blockchain concepts using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain digital-asset risks using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain operational resilience using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Design a conceptual payment service with privacy and control requirements. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Digital payments, Payment reconciliation, Open-banking concepts and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim.
Explain sustainability disclosures using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain materiality using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain climate scenarios using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain transition risk using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain green bonds using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain impact measurement using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain greenwashing using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain data comparability using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Critique an illustrative sustainability-finance claim. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Sustainability disclosures, Materiality, Climate scenarios and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Practical outcome: Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution.
Explain board oversight using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain internal controls using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain audit trails using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain conduct risk using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Use the first concepts from this section. Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. Produce a labelled diagram, trace or calculation; explain each step and check one changed input.
3–6 questions on the preceding first-half concepts only: recall, visual interpretation, application and one plausible misconception. Explain each answer after submission.
Explain anti-money-laundering concepts using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain consumer protection using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain regulatory reporting using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Explain jurisdiction-specific verification using a visual and one worked real-world example. Context: Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. End with a prediction or check-for-understanding.
Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. Work without the example, compare two cases, record assumptions and limitations, then self-review correctness, reasoning and clarity.
6–12 questions covering Board oversight, Internal controls, Audit trails and the remaining section concepts, with cumulative retrieval from earlier sections. Include a new transfer problem; 70% unlocks progression.
Combine all three sections: Map control responsibilities for a fictional financial institution. Submit an original worked artifact, evidence or tests, assumptions and a reflection. Rubric: correctness, method, practical usefulness, reproducibility and communication. Self-reviewed, not certified.
6–12 balanced questions sampling every section of Fintech, Sustainable Finance and Financial Governance, including interpretation, calculation or reasoning, a misconception and a new application. Passing is 70%; review errors before retrying.
Fictional USD budgets, statement analysis, valuation models and risk scenarios. Guided work leads to an independent attempt, with a diagram, explanation, trace, calculation or tested artifact. Question bodies are generated when opened in your private learning path. Programming submissions are stored as text; the platform does not execute submitted code.
Use original or appropriately licensed datasets. Practical science activities use models or supplied data unless a qualified supervisor has reviewed a physical experiment.
Open the interactive practice sampler →